Linking Adaptation and Mitigation in Climate Change Policy

By S. Kane, Jason F. Shogren. 2000

312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d6cb3512a4769fcafa5a590abb734ace3783f299

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Gary W. Yohe
2. I. Goklany
3. Richard S. J. Tol
4. R. Swart
5. F. Raes
6. David Zilberman
7. Jinhuan Zhao
8. Amir Heiman

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Gary W. Yohe
2. I. Goklany
3. R. Swart
4. F. Raes
5. T. Grothmann
6. E. Schipper
7. Anthony G. Patt
8. Arianne J. Cease

Citations in the corpus

• Emission abatement versus development as strategies to reduce vulnerability to climate change: an application of FUND (2005, background): “One exception is Kane and Shogren (2000) , who study the interactions from a risk perspective at a conceptual level, but without specifying these interactions.”
• Making integration of adaptation and mitigation work: mainstreaming into sustainable development policies? (2007, background): “At an aggregate level, adaptation affects the costs and benefits of public mitigation policy (Kane and Shogren, 2000).”
• From Molecules to Management: Mechanisms and Consequences of Locust Phase Polyphenism (2017, background): “When considering the cost or benefits of any of these policies, their impacts must be compared against each other and in conjunction with each other (Kane and Shogren, 2000).”
• Adjustment costs from environmental change (2005, background): “[45] and Kane and Shogren [15], and the volume from the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC [22].”
• Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change (2005, background): “…not simply in order to guide the selection of the best mitigation policies, but rather to reduce the vulnerability of groups of people to the impacts of climate change, and hence minimize the costs associated with the inevitable (Kane and Shogren, 2000; Pielke, 1998; Smit and Pilifosova, 2001).”
• Climate Policy and the Optimal Balance between Mitigation, Adaptation and Unavoided Damage (2010, unknown): “actual relationship is an empirical matter (Kane and Shogren, 2000).”
• Integrated strategies to reduce vulnerability and advance adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable development (2007, background): “Increased focus on such integration within the research community has led to new work in this area (Kane and Shogren 2000; Goklany 2000, 2003; Wilbanks et al. 2003; Dang et al. 2003; Klein et al. 2003; Swart et al. 2003).”
• Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions (2005, background): “Such measures have ancillary benefits, which produces win–win situations (Kane and Shogren, 2000).”
• Synergy of adaptation and mitigation strategies in the context of sustainable development: the case of Vietnam (2003, methodology): “Besides, research on political economics distinguishes between the output of a mitigation measure, which can be considered a global public good with extensive possibilities for free riding, and the output of an adaptation measure, which can be viewed either as a private good or a club good, dependin”
• Mitigative Capacity – the Mirror Image of Adaptive Capacity on the Emissions Side (2001, background): “This is the point of Kane and Shogren (2000), but it is reinforced here by looking carefully at the coincident lists of determinants for mitigative and adaptive capacity.”
• Adoption Versus Adaptation, with Emphasis on Climate Change (2012, background): “Kane & Shogren (2000) investigate how the optimal mix of the two strategies responds to risks.”
• Uncertainty and Climate Change (2002, unknown): “See Kane and Shogren (2000) for a summary on adaption and mitigation arguments.”