The Prior Can Often Only Be Understood in the Context of the Likelihood

By Andrew Gelman, Daniel P. Simpson, Michael Betancourt. Entropy, 2017

481 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A key sticking point of Bayesian analysis is the choice of prior distribution, and there is a vast literature on potential defaults including uniform priors, Jeffreys’ priors, reference priors, maximum entropy priors, and weakly informative priors. These methods, however, often manifest a key conceptual tension in prior modeling: a model encoding true prior information should be chosen without reference to the model of the measurement process, but almost all common prior modeling techniques are implicitly motivated by a reference likelihood. In this paper we resolve this apparent paradox by placing the choice of prior into the context of the entire Bayesian analysis, from inference to prediction to model evaluation.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d6aec3a33b61987c5b18973e9cc46d6b9ae66767

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. Paul-Christian Burkner
  2. Charles C. Margossian
  3. Andrew Gelman
  4. Jonah Gabry
  5. Daniel P. Simpson
  6. Aki Vehtari
  7. Yuling Yao

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Paul-Christian Burkner
  2. Aki Vehtari
  3. Andrew Gelman
  4. Yuling Yao
  5. Daniel P. Simpson
  6. Charles C. Margossian
  7. Jonah Gabry
  8. Bob Carpenter

Citations in the corpus