Broad Reach or Biased Source? Decomposing the Hostile Media Effect
By Albert C. Gunther, J. Liebhart. 2006
181 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d6a6e1fc5ea09ed855e162d226d0b83715b0b8f1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Decision Sciences
In Literature and Literary Theory
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Influence of Hostile Media Perception on Willingness to Engage in Discursive Activities: An Examination of Mediating Role of Media Indignation (2008, background): “Such appraisal involves egocentric applications of some normative standards of factuality, neutrality, and truth telling (Gunther & Liebhart, 2006).”
- Is the Media Biased Against Me? A Meta-Analysis of the Hostile Media Effect Research (2011, methodology): “These three explanations have been tested; however, the research has found convincing evidence only for the selective categorization (Gunther & Liebhart, 2006; Schmitt et al., 2004; Vallone et al., 1985).”
- Partisan Differences in Opinionated News Perceptions: A Test of the Hostile Media Effect (2011, background): “In fact, the explanation for the hostile media effect that has received the most empirical support in the literature is the idea of selective categorization (Giner-Sorolla and Chaiken 1994; Schmitt et al. 2004; Gunther and Liebhart 2006 ).”
- A Three-Decade Retrospective on the Hostile Media Effect (2015, unknown): “A number of experiments have offered consistent support for this notion (Gunther & Liebhart, 2006; Gunther et al., 2012; Gunther et al., 2009; Gunther & Schmitt, 2004; Schmitt, Gunther, & Liebhart, 2004).”