High-Performance Algorithms for Drift Avoidance and Fast Tracking in Solar MPPT System

By Ashish Pandey, Nivedita Dasgupta, Ashok Mukerjee. IEEE transactions on energy conversion, 2008

301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Modified Perturb and Observe MPPT Algorithm for Drift Avoidance in Photovoltaic Systems (2015, methodology): “To improve both steady state and dynamic performances of the P&O algorithm, an adaptive step size is chosen in [8], [14], and [33].”
An Enhanced MPPT Method Combining Model-Based and Heuristic Techniques (2016, background): “hill climbing technique except that the perturbation here is in the voltage instead of the duty cycle [6], [7].”
A Center Point Iteration MPPT Method With Application on the Frequency-Modulated LLC Microinverter (2014, methodology): “improve the performance, variable perturb P&O methods are utilized [12]–[15].”
A Modified P&O Maximum Power Point Tracking Method With Reduced Steady-State Oscillation and Improved Tracking Efficiency (2016, methodology): “In [17], [18], [27]–[29], the duty cycle (d) based adaptive P&O schemes are proposed.”
An Enhanced Adaptive P&O MPPT for Fast and Efficient Tracking Under Varying Environmental Conditions (2018, background): “In [11]–[13], [17], [18], several adaptive versions of the P&O are proposed to reduce the steady state oscillation.”