Internal geometry evaluation of non-crimp 3D orthogonal woven carbon fabric composite

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Mechanical modelling of 3D woven composites considering realistic unit cell geometry (2014, background): “In practice it is difficult to exceed iy-FVFs greater than 70–75% (see for example [23–25]) as unlike the model, fibres in a real yarn are not perfectly aligned and have some level of entanglement.”
Uncertainty in the manufacturing of fibrous thermosetting composites: A review (2014, unknown): “dimensions, of 3-4% for tow spacing [18].”
In-plane and through-thickness properties, failure modes, damage and delamination in 3D woven carbon fibre composites subjected to impact loading (2012, background): “Due to the statistical variability within the weave architecture, an average over several cross section slices is likely to yield more representative values [39].”
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF REAL AND SIMULATED FIBRE ARRANGEMENTS IN UNIDIRECTIONAL COMPOSITES (2013, methodology): “Real fibre distributions are reconstructed from microscopy images of yarns in a 3D non-crimp woven carbon/epoxy composite [29].”