Good and poor adherence: optimal cut-point for adherence measures using administrative claims data
By S. Karve, M. Cleves, M. Helm, T. Hudson, D. West, B. Martin. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 2009
597 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Family Practice, Psychiatry and Mental health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d65dbb62c0e808676e7d2a75441948bb0e2655c3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- D. Hershman
- T. Shao
- L. Kushi
- D. Buono
- W. Tsai
- L. Fehrenbacher
- M. Kwan
- D. H. Bakker
Citations in the corpus
- The effectiveness of interventions using electronic reminders to improve adherence to chronic medication: a systematic review of the literature (2012, background): “In adherence research, a patient is often classified as adherent when an adherence rate of over 80% is reached.(59) This cut-off point indicates the minimum level of adherence needed for therapeutic effect.”
- Early discontinuation and non-adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy are associated with increased mortality in women with breast cancer (2010, background): “, the medication possession ratio (MPR), was greater than or equal to 80%, a definition commonly used in the adherence literature [22, 23].”