The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English

By Jeannett Martin, P. White. 2005

3,082 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d65bbc20fef0201cf7d1cb2e91a0181354c08dd9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning – mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making (2015, background): “…question as to how subject-specific literacy learning can be promoted in school has been addressed by several scholars including Veel (1997), Martin and White (2005), Coffin (2006a, 2006b), Halliday and Matthiessen (2004), Martin and Rose (2008) and Llinares et al. (2012), drawing…”
Socio-emotional connections: identity, belonging and learning in online interactions. A literature review (2014, background): “This may in part be due to dialogic processes being shut down or discouraged by monologic utterances as they tend not to invite discussion (Martin & White, 2005).”
Personal and Impersonal Authorial References: A Contrastive Study of English and Italian Linguistics Research Articles. (2010, background): “The study of appraisal in language, for instance, focuses on the “subjective presence of writers/speakers in texts as they adopt stances towards both the material they present and those with whom they communicate” (Martin and White, 2005, pp. 1).”
Sentiment analysis in multiple languages: Feature selection for opinion classification in Web forums (2008, methodology): “Developed based on appraisal theory [Martin and White 2005], each expression is manually classiﬁed into various appraisal classes.”
Reworking the appraisal framework in ESL research: refining attitude resources (2015, methodology): “Figure 2 The Affect system and its lexical instantiations (Martin and White 2005, 51). Ngo and Unsworth Functional Linguistics (2015) 2:1 Page 4 of 24”
Detecting offensive tweets via topical feature discovery over a large scale twitter corpus (2012, methodology): “In our work we treat vulgarity as a type of linguistic style [11] that is expressed within a sentence with a certain rhythm or periodicity, which explains the tendency for a piece of vulgar text to contain more than one vulgar word.”
Emotion Talk Across Corpora (2008, methodology): “Essentially, emotion talk for her corresponds to what is termed affect in the appraisal model (Martin and White 2005); and she argues that, although her approach does not draw on SFL as a whole, appraisal, and the affect categories in particular, are eminently suitable for her purposes, since they a”
Aspect-based sentiment analysis of movie reviews on discussion boards (2010, methodology): “Whitelaw, Garg and Argamon [19] proposed a method for sentiment classification by extracting and analysing appraisal groups, based on the appraisal theory framework [24].”
Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter (2011, methodology): “The Appraisal framework (Martin and White, 2005), a model of evaluative language using the SFL approach, is then detailed.”
Using appraisal groups for sentiment analysis (2005, background): “Immediate applications include data and web mining, market research, and customer relationship management.”