Approaches to the Planning of Coherent Text

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Towards Coherent and Cohesive Long-form Text Generation (2018, background): “…and other forms of coherence and cohesion relations and their quantiﬁ-cation (Edmundson, 1969; Halliday and Hasan, 1976; Hobbs, 1985; McKeown, 1985; Cohen and Levesque, 1985; Hovy, 1988; Liddy, 1991; Hovy, 1991; Mani et al., 1998; Cristea et al., 1998; Barzi-lay and Lapata, 2008; Van Dijk, 2013).”
Survey of the State of the Art in Natural Language Generation: Core tasks, applications and evaluation (2017, background): “In a similar vein, both Hovy (1991) and Moore and Paris (1993) interpreted the relations of Rhetorical Structure Theory (Mann & Thompson, 1988) as operators for text planning.”
Planning Text for Advisory Dialogues: Capturing Intentional and Rhetorical Information (1993, methodology): “This is the approach taken by most systems employing schemata, e.g., (McKeown 1985; Paris 1991b), and is also common in systems that make use of linear planners, e.g., (Cawsey 1993; Hovy 1991; Maybury 1992).”