Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

By Paul J. Gertler, James J. Heckman, Rodrigo Pinto, A. Zanolini, Christel Vermeerch, S. Walker, Susan M. Chang, S. Grantham‐McGregor. Science, 2014

731 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Help as hungry children helps young adults Supporters of early childhood interventions follow the rule “better early than late,” but so far there's been limited evidence that the rule applies to disadvantaged children in developing countries. Gertler et al. looked at the earnings of young adults in Jamaica, 20 years after, as toddlers, they were given 2 years of help from community health workers. The earnings of the treatment group caught up to those of a comparison group of well-fed children, but the control group of undernourished children that did not receive the health worker visits has lagged behind. Science, this issue p. 998 Encouraging greater mother-child interactions can compensate in the long term for poor nutrition. A substantial literature shows that U.S. early childhood interventions have important long-term economic benefits. However, there is little evidence on this question for developing countries. We report substantial effects on the earnings of participants in a randomized intervention conducted in 1986–1987 that gave psychosocial stimulation to growth-stunted Jamaican toddlers. The intervention consisted of weekly visits from community health workers over a 2-year period that taught parenting skills and encouraged mothers and children to interact in ways that develop cognitive and socioemotional skills. The authors reinterviewed 105 out of 129 study participants 20 years later and found that the intervention increased earnings by 25%, enough for them to catch up to the earnings of a nonstunted comparison group identified at baseline (65 out of 84 participants).

Subfields: Education, Nutrition and Dietetics, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d63d44fda65cc82514650d52da3587c8e0189d86

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

  1. Adam M. Lavecchia
  2. Richard J. Murnane
  3. Kathleen G. Beegle
  4. O. Attanasio
  5. Philip Oreopoulos
  6. A. Ganimian
  7. Andrew G. Meyer
  8. Daniel M. Hungerman

In Nutrition and Dietetics

  1. Richard J. Murnane
  2. Kathleen G. Beegle
  3. O. Attanasio
  4. A. Ganimian

In Safety Research

  1. Joseph P. Romano
  2. Richard J. Murnane
  3. Kathleen G. Beegle
  4. O. Attanasio
  5. Philip Oreopoulos
  6. A. Ganimian

Citations in the corpus