Intuitive Class/Shape Function Parameterization for Airfoils

By Fengxia Zhu, Ning Qin. 2014

65 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d62ae5a5fe4bd1194cb082f73e3436d5c49e86c1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. Christian B. Allen
2. Daniel J. Poole
3. Thomas C. S. Rendall

In Computational Mechanics

1. Daniel J. Poole
2. Christian B. Allen
3. Thomas C. S. Rendall
4. A. Morris
5. A. Michler

Citations in the corpus

• Metric-Based Mathematical Derivation of Efficient Airfoil Design Variables (2015, methodology): “For example, Zhu and Qin [31] recently presented a method that has the intuitiveness of PARSEC with the flexibility of the popular CST method and compared their method to both CST and PARSEC.”
• High-fidelity aerodynamic shape optimization using efficient orthogonal modal design variables with a constrained global optimizer (2017, methodology): “[30] F. Zhu, N. Qin, Intuitive class/shape function parameterization for airfoils, AIAA Journal 52 (1) (2014) 17–25. doi:10.2514/1.”