Agency Conflicts in Public and Negotiated Transfers of Corporate Control
By Mike Burkart, Denis Gromb, Fausto Panunzi. 2000
144 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d6220964ef054aa89483d3bbbfcc9023c264b314
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
Citations in the corpus
- Corporate Governance Convergence : Evidence from Takeover Regulation Reforms in Europe (2005, background): “13 It is only in the absence of large private benefits of control that private negotiations with the incumbent controlling blockholder are likely to result in lower costs for a control transfer than an open market purchase from dispersed shareholders (Bagnoli and Lipman (1988), Holmstrom and Nalebuf”
- Ownership structure, control contestability, and corporate debt maturity (2015, unknown): “ 9 Burkart et al. (2000) argue that direct evidence on private benefits is hard to find.”
- Quantifying Private Benefits of Control from a Structural Model of Block Trades (2010, unknown): “We estimate the block pricing model in Burkart, Gromb, and Panunzi (2000) explicitly accounting for both block premia and block discounts in the data.”
- Negotiations Under the Threat of an Auction (2010, unknown): “A related two-stage representation of the takeover contest can also be found in Burkart et al. (2000).”
- One Share - One Vote: The Theory (2007, background): “…in control, the bidder has the option 16 In the theoretical literature, the block price is typically the outcome of a bargaining game between incumbent and bidder that depends on the parties outside options (see e.g., Burkart et al., 2000). to purchase the remaining voting and non-voting shares.”