Comparison of the Short‐Term Survival Benefit Associated With Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With No Prior Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion…
By R. Hachamovitch, S. Hayes, J. Friedman, I. Cohen, D. Berman. Circulation, 2003
1,498 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d61929cca87389a85200e0d71a73a37c64c29ce5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- W. Wijns
- P. Tonino
- Nils P Johnson
- Philippe Kolh
- N. Pijls
- G. Toth
- D. Maron
- J. Knuuti
Citations in the corpus
- Prognostic value of fractional flow reserve: linking physiologic severity to clinical outcomes. (2014, methodology): “The conceptual curve in the Central Illustration for FFR appears similar to work using nuclear perfusion imaging (9) in that “ischemia” by either technique relates continuously to outcomes as modulated by treatment (medical therapy vs.”
- Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden: Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy (2008, methodology): “02; (2) n 82: (a) no vs ischemia, P 0.”