Dietary and Feeding Differences Between Sympatric Propithecus diadema diadema and Indri indri

By Joyce A. Powzyk, C. Mowry. International journal of primatology, 2003

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Plant Science, Sensory Systems, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5fbbd1dda0fe456282b28a3f62a3c39e1cc3723

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. R. Mittermeier
2. A. Rylands
3. Ian Tattersall
4. A. Marshall
5. C. Groves
6. R. Wrangham
7. Martin N. Muller
8. John C. Mitani

Citations in the corpus

• Evolutionary Consequences of Fallback Foods (2007, background): “We suggest that one can readily recognize the distinction between staple and filler FBFs. Cases of staple FBFs include leaves for proboscis monkeys ( Nasalis larvatus) at Tanjung Puting (Yeager 1989), young leaves for Indri indri at Mantadia (Powzyk and Mowry 2003), and leaves for howlers ( Alouatta”
• Influence of Plant and Soil Chemistry on Food Selection, Ranging Patterns, and Biomass of Colobus guereza in Kakamega Forest, Kenya (2007, unknown): “Assay procedures followed those of Remis et al. (2001) and Powzyk and Mowry (2003).”
• Lemur Diversity in Madagascar (2008, background): “Researchers have reported adult masses of 6–7 kg, which are similar to those of Indri (cf. Powzyk and Mowry 2003).”