A conceptual framework and belief‐function approach to assessing overall information quality

By Matthew Bovee, R. Srivastava, B. Mak. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2003

316 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Survey on Data Quality: Classifying Poor Data (2015, background): “A conceptual framework and belief function to assess information quality is discussed in [39].”
Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination Within the Context of Data Warehousing (2005, unknown): “[ 14 , 39 , 82 ] A cc e s s i b ili t y I n f o r m a t i on c an be ob t a i ned w hen needed .”
Open data quality measurement framework: Definition and application to Open Government Data (2016, background): “In the literature of data quality, several authors contributed to build an extensive list of data quality characteristics: see for instance Wand and Wang (1996), Wang and Strong (1996), Redman (1996), Jarke et al. (1995), Bovee et al. (2003), Naumann (2002), (Batini & Scannapieco, 2006).”
Data quality: A survey of data quality dimensions (2012, background): “Volatility is a measure of information instability the frequency of change of the value for an entity attribute [2, 16].”
Quality assessment for Linked Data: A Survey (2015, background): “Previously published literature provides a thorough classiﬁcation of the data quality dimensions [11,32,49,52,61,63].”