Does meta-cognitive theory enhance our understanding of pathological worry and anxiety?

By Robert N. Davis, D. Valentiner. 2000

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5ed482445f45755fb0a2103f3188f82af634a1e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. E. Watkins
2. Michelle L. Moulds
3. Susan Nolen-Hoeksema
4. F. Raes
5. A. Aldao
6. Henrietta Roberts
7. J. M. G. Williams
8. Sonja Lyubomirsky

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. E. Watkins
2. Michelle L. Moulds
3. Susan Nolen-Hoeksema
4. F. Raes
5. T. Ehring
6. A. Aldao
7. Henrietta Roberts
8. Sonja Lyubomirsky

Citations in the corpus

• Positive beliefs about rumination in depression—a replication and extension (2005, background): “…worry is helpful for problem solving (Borkovec & Roemer, 1995; Freeston, Rheaume, Letarte, Dugas, & Ladouceur, 1994), and negative metacognitive beliefs, which emphasise the risks and negative consequences of worry, e.g. that worry is uncontrollable (Davis & Valentiner, 2000; Wells & Carter, 1999).”