KNIME - the Konstanz information miner: version 2.0 and beyond

By Michael R. Berthold, N. Cebron, Fabian Dill, Thomas R. Gabriel, Tobias Kötter, T. Meinl, Peter Ohl, Kilian Thiel, Bernd Wiswedel. SKDD, 2009

1,046 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5ec4df65baa9b35cde29ce6a769bf6505ddfcaf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Feida Zhu
2. David Lo
3. Dhaval Patel
4. Ee-Peng Lim
5. Kelvin Sim
6. Zeyar Aung
7. Clifton Phua
8. Bijay Neupane

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. David Lo

In Information Systems and Management

1. David Lo

Citations in the corpus

• Knowledge Generation Model for Visual Analytics (2014, neutral): “At first, we assess Knime [1](Version 2.”
• Integrated Omics: Tools, Advances, and Future Approaches. (2019, methodology): “To this end, The Konstanz Information Miner (KNIME)-based modular environment workflow incorporates steps from data preprocessing to statistical analysis and visualization of omics scale data (Berthold et al. 2009).”
• Detecting click fraud in online advertising: a data mining approach (2014, methodology): “…2006) into subsets and principal component analysis is applied to each Tree ensemble Variant of random forest whereby each tree model is learned on (Berthold et al., 2009) different set of records and/or attributes models and picked the configuration that yields the best result on the internal…”