Caution! Men not at work: Gender-specific labor market conditions and child maltreatment
By Jason M. Lindo, Jessamyn Schaller, Benjamin C. Hansen. Journal of Public Economics, 2018
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This paper examines the effect of labor market conditions—measured through unemployment, mass layoffs and predicted employment—on child abuse and neglect using county-level data from California. Using these indicators we separately estimate the effects of overall and gender-specific economic shocks. We find only modest evidence of a link between overall economic conditions and child maltreatment. However, analysis by gender reveals robust evidence that maltreatment decreases with indicators for male employment and increases with indicators for female employment. These opposite-signed effects are consistent with a theoretical framework that builds on family-time-use models and is supported by analysis of time-use data.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5e21f92ae901584d252d6b00bfb9a686d4575af
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- David H. Autor
- David Dorn
- Gordon H. Hanson
- Daron Acemoglu
- David J. Deming
- John Van Reenen
- K. K. Charles
- W. Dauth
Citations in the corpus
- Sheltering in place and domestic violence: Evidence from calls for service during COVID-19 (2020, unknown): “Changes in economic opportunities and uncertainty, increased parental time at home during unemployment, and emotional cues have all been found to impact the prevalence of domestic violence (Aizer and Bo, 2009; Aizer, 2010; Anderberg et al., 2016; Lindo et al., 2018; Card and Dahl, 2011).”
- When Work Disappears: Manufacturing Decline and the Falling Marriage Market Value of Young Men (2017, background): “…adverse local economic shocks reduce teen birthrates and sexual activity, while raising contraceptive use and abortion, while Page et al. (2007) and Lindo et al. (2013) document adverse impacts 2 shrink the pool of economically secure young adult men and erode traditional household arrange- ments.”