A technical comparison of three low earth orbit satellite constellation systems to provide global broadband

By Iñigo Del Portillo, B. Cameron, E. Crawley. Acta Astronautica, 2019

899 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract The idea of providing Internet access from space has made a strong comeback in recent years. After a relatively quiet period following the setbacks suffered by the projects proposed in the ’90s, a new wave of proposals for large constellations of low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites to provide global broadband access emerged between 2014 and 2016. Compared to their predecessors, the main differences of these systems are: increased performance that results from the use of digital communication payloads, advanced modulation schemes, multi-beam antennas, and more sophisticated frequency reuse schemes, as well as the cost reductions from advanced manufacturing processes (such as assembly line, highly automated, and continuous testing) and reduced launch costs. This paper compares three such large LEO satellite constellations, namely SpaceX's 4425 satellites Ku-Ka-band system, OneWeb's 720 satellites Ku-Ka-band system, and Telesat's 117 satellites Ka-band system. First, we present the system architecture of each of the constellations (as described in their respective FCC filings as of September 2018), highlighting the similarities and differences amongst the three systems. Following that, we develop a statistical method to estimate the total system throughput (sellable capacity), considering both the orbital dynamics of the space-segment and the variability in performance induced by atmospheric conditions both for the user and feeder links. Given that the location and number of ground stations play a major role in determining the total system throughput, and since the characteristics of the ground segment are not described in the FCC applications, we then run an optimization procedure to minimize the total number of stations required to support the system throughput. Finally, we conclude by identifying some of the major technical challenges that the three systems will have to overcome before becoming operational.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5d342a5e6d5673dcf805096106e6fc1aa849f3f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

Citations in the corpus

6G Wireless Systems: Vision, Requirements, Challenges, Insights, and Opportunities (2020, result): “The study in [46] compares Telesat’s, OneWeb’s, and”
A Survey on Nongeostationary Satellite Systems: The Communication Perspective (2021, background): “17- 23 Gbps, depending on the characteristics of the user terminals [14].”
Integrated Satellite-Terrestrial Networks Toward 6G: Architectures, Applications, and Challenges (2022, background): “Various satellite constellation projects have been established to construct satellite communication networks for global coverage, such as Starlink, OneWeb, and Telesat [8].”