Creative potential, attention, and speed of information processing
By Oshin Vartanian, C. Martindale, Jonna Kwiatkowski. 2007
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5d2a7eb9614837981d8439fbc81c08c8a93941c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Paul T. Sowden
- Andrew Pringle
- Mathias Benedek
- Andreas Fink
- R. Horan
- M. Beeman
- C. Dobson
- Liane Gabora
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Paul T. Sowden
- Andrew Pringle
- Mathias Benedek
- Andreas Fink
- R. Horan
- Liane Gabora
- Kalina Christoff
- Melissa Ellamil
Citations in the corpus
- The Neuropsychological Connection Between Creativity and Meditation (2009, background): “Martindale ( 1999 ) suggested that attention in creatives is a variable state that becomes defocused, allowing irrelevant information to combine when solving ill-defined problems, and focused when verifying ideas (see also Vartanian, Martindale, & Kwiatkowski, 2007 ).”
- The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual-process theory (2014, background): “The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual-process theory”
- Creativity and the Stroop interference effect (2014, background): “…reaction times on simple tasks not involving interference, but slower reaction times on tasks requiring the inhibition of interfering information than less creative persons (Dorfman et al., 2008; Vartanian et al., 2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.009 0191-8869/ 2014 Elsevier Ltd.”
- Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process (2012, background): “…et al., 2001; Shulman and Fiez, 1997), it may facilitate an associative mode of processing that supports the generation of novel ideas (Dorfman et al., 2008; Howard-Jones and Murray, 2003; Vartanian et al., 2007), thereby contributing to creative generation more than to creative evaluation.”