The Syntax‐Phonology Interface
By E. Selkirk. 2011
755 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5ce12897ea335c164828b4229724ac83fb4be1d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Contrastive focus vs. discourse-new: Evidence from phonetic prominence in English (2012, neutral): “But the notion that every sentence must contain at least one Focus (if not narrow then broad) is questionable on semantic/pragmatic grounds (Kratzer & Selkirk 2010, 2011).”
- Canonical Typology, Suppletion, and Possible Words (2007, background): “This is an incoming condition; it may be treated as a shape condition (Pullum & Zwicky 1988:263).37 Note that it is not evidence for phonological determination of suppletion (§3.4); that distinction related to material within the paradigm, while here suppletion is conditioned from outside.38 Once…”