A particular case and a general pattern: hyperaggressive behaviour by one species may mediate avifaunal decreases in fragmented Australian forests

By S. Piper, Carla P. Catterall. 2003

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Temporal variation in bird assemblages: How representative is a one-year snapshot? (2005, background): “For example, the influences of patch edges, area, and habitat structure on bird distribution may appear to vary from year to year if these variables are surrogates for factors such as the presence of competitors, predators or particular food sources (Burke & Nol 1998; Piper & Catterall 2003).”
The influence of native versus exotic streetscape vegetation on the spatial distribution of birds in suburbs and reserves (2013, background): “*Correspondence: Karen Ikin, The Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia E-mail: karen.ikin@anu.edu.au Aim Management practices in the landscape matrix can have significant effects on the spatial distribution of animals within adjac”
Avifaunal disarray due to a single despotic species (2013, background): “…such as forest, noisy miner colonies occur more frequently on edges adjacent to, or protrusions into, open country such as urban or agricultural land, especially where there are adjacent scattered trees or suitable suburban-style gardens (Loyn, 1987a; Piper & Catterall, 2003; Taylor et al., 2008).”
A PREDICTIVE MODEL OF EDGE EFFECTS (2004, background): “There are also examples of interspecific competition driving edge responses that may not be predicted by our model (Suarez et al. 1998, Piper and Catterall 2003).”