Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial--PRAGUE-2.
By Petr Widimsky, T. Buděšínský, D. Voráč, L. Groch, M. Želízko, M. Aschermann, M. Branny, J. Šťásek, P. Formánek. European Heart Journal, 2003
819 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5aa41f592ed074070e551d339ab00f35ee2d183
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Z. Obermeyer
- Sendhil Mullainathan
- Susan Athey
- Joshua Schwartzstein
- Emilio Ferrara
- David Strömberg
- Stefano DellaVigna
- Xavier Giroud
Citations in the corpus
- Supplement to: Who is Tested for Heart Attack and Who Should Be: Predicting Patient Risk and Physician Error (2019, background): “Of course, not all hospitals have a catheterization facility, but there is growing evidence that transferring patients to a hospital that does is superior to thrombolysis despite the delays induced by transport time (Widimský and others 2003).”