Methods for the detection of beef and pork in foods using real-time polymerase chain reaction
By I. Laube, A. Spiegelberg, A. Butschke, J. Zagon, M. Schauzu, L. Kroh, H. Broll. 2003
85 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5a0b4a2a1f6e307a7302effaf68f684bcb54344
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Molecular Biology
Citations in the corpus
- Multiplex PCR in Species Authentication: Probability and Prospects—A Review (2014, background): “…Dooley et al. (2004) Haddock Transferrin – Hird et al. (2004) Cattle Growth hormone 0.02 Brodmann and Moor (2003) Cattle and pork Phosphodiesterase, ryanodine gene – Laube et al. (2003) Molecular Beacon Chemistry Pork cytb 0.0001 Hazim et al. (2012) SYBR Green chemistry Tuna species…”
- Multiplex real-time PCR for the detection and quantification of DNA from beef, pork, horse and sheep (2008, methodology): “PCR techniques proved their applicability for the analysis of mixed processed food already in the past [2–17].”
- Comparison of real-time PCR and ELISA-based methods for the detection of beef and pork in processed meat products (2017, methodology): “On the 237 other hand, Laube et al. (2003) showed slightly greater sensitivity for beef detection at 0.1% w/w 238 in a beef/pork mixture tested with real-time PCR. 239 3.2.”