Shape indices to identify regional differences in otolith morphology of comber, Serranus cabrilla (L., 1758)
By V. Tuset, I. J. Lozano, José A. González, J. Pertusa, M. García-Díaz. 2003
230 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Summary Sagittal otoliths from the Atlantic and Mediterranean regions of Serranus cabrilla L. were compared using shape indices (form-factor, roundness, circularity, rectangularity, ellipticity and eccentricity). Regional differences were best described by form-factor, circularity and eccentricity variables. The canonical discriminant functions were built with form-factor or rectangularity indices. The results indicated slight regional variations. The G-test was the criterion more useful to identify the otolith origin in the discriminant analysis.
Subfields: Aquatic Science, Geometry and Topology, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5928c332204157048dfa344f627825d9a61fd9e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aquatic Science
In Geometry and Topology
In Global and Planetary Change
- V. Tuset
- R. Lecomte-Finiger
- Antoni Lombarte
- C. Assis
- Yves Letourneur
- Deirdre Brophy
- Stefano Mariani
- B. Mérigot
Citations in the corpus
- Characterization of local populations of the common sole Solea solea (Pisces, Soleidae) in the NW Mediterranean through otolith morphometrics and shape analysis (2007, methodology): “These measures allowed the calculation of five shape indices (Table 2) which are independent from differences in otolith size (but see hereafter) (Russ 1990; Tuset et al. 2003a, b).”
- Otolith atlas for the western Mediterranean, north and central eastern Atlantic (2008, background): “…Berdar and Li Greci, 1986); species, population or fishery stock identification (e.g. Yefanov and Khorevin, 1979; Messieh, et al., 1989; Lombarte and Castellón, 1991; Castonguay et al., 1991; Campana and Casselman, 1993; Friedland and Reddin, 1994; Torres et al., 2000; Tuset et al. 2003a, 2006.)”
- A comparison of otolith microchemistry and otolith shape analysis for the study of spatial variation in a deep-sea teleost, Coryphaenoides rupestris (2010, methodology): “These measurements were then used to manually calculate simple shape indices as detailed in Table 2 (Tuset et al. 2003).”
- Use of otolith shape for stock identification of John's snapper, Lutjanus johnii (Pisces: Lutjanidae), from the Persian Gulf and the Oman Sea (2014, methodology): “To test for differences in the relationship between otolith weight and fish length between areas an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed, previous linear-logarithmic transformation of variables, where area was the main factor and fish length was the covariate (Tuset et al., 2003).”