Adjusting for Dropout Variance in Batch Normalization and Weight Initialization
By Dan Hendrycks, Kevin Gimpel. 2016
17 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Optimization & Training
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Optimization & Training
- Dan Hendrycks
- Kevin Gimpel
- Shuo Chen
- Daniel Cremers
- Xiaolin Hu
- Xiang-Yang Li
- Vladimir Golkov
- Jan Kukacka
Citations in the corpus
- Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs) (2016, background): “Weights are initialized with unit norm rows, as this has positive impact on each nonlinearity’s performance (Hendrycks & Gimpel, 2016; Mishkin & Matas, 2016; Saxe et al., 2014).”
- A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networks (2016, methodology): “Note that treating error/abnormal classes as positive classes does not change the AU- 1We consider adversarial example detection techniques in a separate work (Hendrycks & Gimpel, 2016a).”
- Regularization for Deep Learning: A Taxonomy (2017, background): “• Initialization without pre-training – Random weight initialization (Rumelhart et al., 1986, p. 330; Glorot and Bengio, 2010; He et al., 2015; Hendrycks and Gimpel, 2016) – Orthogonal weight matrices (Saxe et al., 2013) – Data-dependent weight initialization (Krähenbühl et al., 2015) •…”
- Understanding the Disharmony Between Dropout and Batch Normalization by Variance Shift (2018, background): “We discover the key to understand the disharmony between Dropout and BN is the inconsistent behaviors of neural variance [12] during the switch of networks’ state.”