Misconceptions about parsimony analysis of endemicity

By S. Nihei. 2006

83 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5856c71cb6e2b1a9a4a2c7d37521c088826d80c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. M. Pinna
2. F. Dagosta
3. J. Morrone

In Paleontology

1. M. Pinna
2. F. Dagosta
3. J. Morrone
4. S. Nihei
5. I. Ferro
6. J. Pirani
7. I. Sanmartín
8. A. Tribsch

Citations in the corpus

• Biogeography of Amazonian fishes: deconstructing river basins as biogeographic units (2017, methodology): “Parsimony Analysis of Endemicity (PAE) (Rosen, 1988) has been severely criticized in the literature as a method of historical biogeographic analysis (cf. Humphries, 1989; Humphries, Parenti, 1999; Brooks, Van Veller, 2003; Nihei, 2006).”
• Parsimony analysis of endemicity (PAE) revisited (2014, methodology): “…& Amorim, 2007; Garz on-Ordu~na et al., 2008; Peterson, 2008; Carine et al., 2009; Casagranda et al., 2012; Donato & Miranda-Esquivel, 2012), while others have defended it (Escalante & Morrone, 2003; Nihei, 2006; Morrone, 2009; Echeverry & Morrone, 2010; Escalante, 2011; Crother & Murray, 2013).”