On the completeness of orientation rules for causal discovery in the presence of latent confounders and selection bias
By Jiji Zhang. 2008
523 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Jan Peters
- Peter Buhlmann
- Marloes H. Maathuis
- Joris M. Mooij
- Nicolai Meinshausen
- Mathias Drton
- Kun Zhang
In Information Systems
- Peter Buhlmann
- Marloes H. Maathuis
- Nicolai Meinshausen
- Joris M. Mooij
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Sara Magliacane
- Tom Claassen
- Christina Heinze-Deml
Citations in the corpus
- Domain Adaptation by Using Causal Inference to Predict Invariant Conditional Distributions (2017, methodology): “ch as [Hyttinen et al., 2014, Triantafillou and Tsamardinos, 2015, Magliacane et al., 2016], are ideally suited to exploit the background knowledge. For other methods, e.g., FCI [Spirtes et al., 2000, Zhang, 2008], incorporating all background knowledge is less straightforward and as far as we know c”
- Distinguishing Cause from Effect Using Observational Data: Methods and Benchmarks (2014, background): “For example, in that case, and under a genericity condition called “faithfulness”, conditional independences between subsets of observed variables allow one to draw partial conclusions regarding their causal relationships (Spirtes et al., 2000; Pearl, 2000; Richardson and Spirtes, 2002; Zhang, 2008)”
- Order-independent constraint-based causal structure learning (2012, methodology): “We start by discussing several prominent examples of such algorithms, designed for different settings.”
- Causal Structure Learning (2017, background): “There are also additional orientation rules, which were shown to be complete in Zhang (2008b).”
- DAG-GNN: DAG Structure Learning with Graph Neural Networks (2019, methodology): “Popular algorithms include SGS (Spirtes et al., 2000b), PC (Spirtes et al., 2000b), IC (Pearl, 2003), and FCI (Spirtes et al., 1995; Zhang, 2008).”
- D’ya Like DAGs? A Survey on Structure Learning and Causal Discovery (2021, unknown): “PC [228] 1993 constraint yes yes yes no CPDAG FCI [229, 275] 1995 constraint no yes yes no POIPG CCD [200] 1996 constraint yes yes both no PAG TPDA [31] 2002 constraint yes yes yes no CPDAG CPC [193] 2006 constraint yes relaxed yes no CPDAG KCL [233] 2007 constraint yes yes yes no CPDAG ION [241] 20”
- Foundations of structural causal models with cycles and latent variables (2016, methodology): “Recently, it has been shown that even the well-known Fast Causal Inference (FCI) algorithm [69, 75] is directly applicable to simple SCMs [41] and provides a consistent estimate of the Markov equivalence class (under the faithfulness assumption).”
- Causal Transfer Learning (2017, methodology): “For other methods, e.g., FCI [Spirtes et al., 2000, Zhang, 2008], incorporating all background knowledge is less straightforward and as far as we know cannot be done with off-the-shelf implementations.”
- Structure Learning in Graphical Modeling (2016, methodology): “The FCI algorithm also uses more complicated orientation rules, which were extended and proved to be complete by Zhang (2008).”
- Controlling Selection Bias in Causal Inference (2011, background): “Remarkably, there are special cases in which selection bias can be detected even from observations, as in the form of a non-chordal undirected component (Zhang, 2008).”
- A Complete Generalized Adjustment Criterion (2015, background): “Thend∗ is an unshielded possibly directed path fromQ to Z in P (Lemma B.1 from Zhang (2008)).”
- A survey of Bayesian Network structure learning (2021, methodology): “Ancestral graphs have three types of edge (Zhang, 2008b): • directed, e.g. 𝐴 ⟶ 𝐵: The mapping between edge types in the ancestral graph and relationships in the underlying DAG is given in Richardson and Spirtes (2002) but is somewhat complicated.”
- Comparison of Strategies for Scalable Causal Discovery of Latent Variable Models from Mixed Data (2018, methodology): “Finally, all edges are reoriented to have both circle endpoints, and then orientation rules are applied as given by Zhang [30].”
- Learning Sparse Causal Models is not NP-hard (2013, methodology): “…is order O ( N 4 ): for N 2 edge marks it checks for certain paths in G which can be done in O ( N 2 k ) by a ‘reachability’ algorithm, with Nk ∼ nr. of edges, (Zhang, 2008, p.1881) The dominant terms are O ( N 2 k ) possible hierarchies to test for each of O ( N 2 ) possible edges which may…”
- Recovering from Selection Bias in Causal and Statistical Inference (2014, background): “1 Remarkably, there are special situations in which selection bias can be detected even from observations, as in the form of a non-chordal undirected component (Zhang 2008). the data-generating model in Fig.”
- Distinguishing Cause from Effect Using Observational Data: Methods and Benchmarks (2014, background): “For example, in that case, and under a genericity condition called “faithfulness”, conditional independences between subsets of observed variables allow one to draw partial conclusions regarding their causal relationships (Spirtes et al., 2000; Pearl, 2000; Richardson and Spirtes, 2002; Zhang, 2008)”