On the grammar and semantics of sentence accents By Carlos Gussenhoven (review)
By Julia Hirschberg, G. Ward. 2015
106 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d562ba5106b2ca88a8b60c448ae39d39b1e734ef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Jennifer Cole
- Mark Steedman
- Carlos Gussenhoven
- Sam Hellmuth
- Colin Phillips
- T. Wharton
- Duane G. Watson
Citations in the corpus
- Intonation and interpretation: phonetics and phonology (2002, background): “Within autosegmental approaches to intonation, there have been two proposals for the semantics of intonation contours, [57],[58].”
- THE PROSODY OF SPEECH: MELODY AND RHYTHM (2001, background): “For both British English (Gussenhoven, 1983; Gussenhoven, 1984; Willems et al., 1988) and for Dutch (Collier and 't Hart, 1972; Collier, 1975) it has been shown that pitch contours can be classified into different families.”
- Information Structure and the Syntax-Phonology Interface (2000, background): “…of surface structure engendered by the present theory may also explain some of the examples that Bolinger (1989) used to argue for an entirely autonomous, lexically oriented account of accent assignment, and which Gussenhoven (1983) used to argue for a similarly autonomous focus-based account.”
- Intonational pitch accent distribution in Egyptian Arabic. (2006, background): “Special thanks are due therefore to the staff and students of the English Training Centre, Maadi, Cairo, for welcoming me during July 2004 while I was collecting the experimental data, and especially to the core group of speakers who participated in both experiments, and who were a delight to work w”
- Prosody in context: a review (2015, background): “Gussenhoven (1984) argues that the status of the sentence as eventive (i.e., expressing an actual event) is another factor affecting nuclear prominence, with prominence assigned to the predicate rather than the argument in non-eventive sentences (i.e., hypothetical, conditional or definitional), as…”