Spectral particulate attenuation and particle size distribution in the bottom boundary layer of a continental shelf

By Emmanuel S. Boss, W. Pegau, W. Gardner, J. Zaneveld, A. Barnard, Michael Twardowski, G. Chang, T. Dickey. 2001

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Particulate backscattering ratio at LEO 15 and its use to study particle composition and distribution (2004, methodology): “The beam attenuation per cell at 650 nm is likely not to be affected much by this chromatic adaptation [e.g., Boss et al., 2001b].”
Subsurface maxima of phytoplankton and chlorophyll: Steady‐state solutions from a simple model (2003, background): “…of POC gave good linear correlations (e.g., Gardner et al. 2000), but there is no universal correlation between POC and cp. Published POC versus cp relationships show variability that can be introduced by variations in particle size distribution or composition (e.g., Morel 1973; Boss et al. 2001).”
Beam attenuation and chlorophyll concentration as alternative optical indices of phytoplankton biomass (2006, methodology): “We additionally assessed from the Coulter counter data variability in the slope of particle size distributions and quartile sizes (as in Boss et al., 2001).”
In situ particle size distributions and volume concentrations from a LISST-100 laser particle sizer and a digital floc camera (2005, background): “Such models assume that particle size follows the Junge distribution, for which volume is approximately constant in logarithmically increasing size bins (Boss et al., 2001; Stramski et al., 2001).”