Survival and Event History Analysis
By Peter Congdon. 2007
321 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97db62c57ddca32ccc3f42a43e056286a7c26e76
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- S. Termini
- John P. Klein
- H. V. van Houwelingen
- Joseph G. Ibrahim
- Jan Beyersmann
- Markus Pauly
- Thomas H. Scheike
- Jacques Estève
Citations in the corpus
- On Estimation in Relative Survival (2012, methodology): “Appendix The Derivation of the Newly Proposed Estimate and Its Variance We give here the informal derivation of the newly proposed estimator and its variance that follows closely that for the Nelson–Aalen estimator (see, e.g., Aalen et al., 2008).”
- History of applications of martingales in survival analysis. (2010, unknown): “The monograph combines concrete practical examples, almost all of the authors’ own experience, with an exposition of the mathematical background, several detailed chapters on non- and semiparametric models as well as parametric models, and chapters giving preliminary glimpses into topics to come: se”
- Handbook of survival analysis (2014, background): “A nice discussion of pros and cons of the additive hazards model can be found in Aalen et al. (2008).”
- Regular Article (2004, unknown): “Doob-Meyer theorem (14), each of these (random) counting processes can be decomposed into an integrated conditional intensity process (the signal) and a random process called a martingale (the noise).”
- Weak Convergence of the Wild Bootstrap for the Aalen–Johansen Estimator of the Cumulative Incidence Function of a Competing Risk (2013, background): “…is that the compensator of the counting process of a type j event only involves the at-risk process Yi which arises from the present left-truncation and right-censoring and the cause-specific hazards 0j of the underlying competing risks process (see, e.g. Aalen et al., 2008, section 1.4.2).”