Energy, Gender and Development: What are the Linkages? Where is the Evidence?

By G. Kohlin, Erin Sills, Subhrendu K. Pattanayak, Christopher Wilfong. 2011

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The objective of the report is to review the literature on the links between energy access, welfare, and gender in order to provide evidence on where gender considerations in the energy sector matter and how they might be addressed. Prepared as a background document for the 2012 World Development Report on gender equality and development, as well as a part of the social development department's ongoing work on gender and infrastructure, the report describes and evaluates the evidence on the links between gender and energy focusing on the following areas: increased access to wood fuel through planting of trees and forest management; improved cooking technologies; and access to electricity and motive energy. The report is intended to complement ongoing efforts to formulate a gender business plan for the sustainable development network of the World Bank. It focuses on reviewing the academic evidence and does not aim to offer specific operational recommendations which are better left for the gender business plan and other documents that follow up on the 2012 World Development Report. Focusing on the academic peer-reviewed literature, fairly inclusive screening criteria are applied when selecting the evidence to consider. Thus, much of this review is based on quantitative studies with samples that are relatively small, yet sufficient to support multivariate regressions to control for confounding effects. The main finding of this review is that energy interventions can have significant gender benefits which can be realized via careful design and targeting of interventions based on a context-specific understanding of energy scarcity and household decision-making. The Bank may also want to consider a program of rigorous impact evaluations and participatory monitoring of household energy projects.

Subfields: Energy Engineering and Power Technology, Pollution, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d51856d1676e67059b5b74807c0f55c125e371a4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Energy Engineering and Power Technology

  1. S. Pareglio
  2. Massimo Tavoni
  3. Jacopo Bonan

In Pollution

  1. Dominique van de Walle
  2. S. Pareglio
  3. Gayatri Koolwal
  4. M. Ravallion
  5. V. Mendiratta
  6. Massimo Tavoni
  7. Jacopo Bonan
  8. Nadia S. Ouedraogo

In Safety Research

  1. Dominique van de Walle
  2. M. Ravallion
  3. S. Pareglio
  4. Gayatri Koolwal
  5. A. M. Mobarak
  6. V. Mendiratta
  7. Massimo Tavoni
  8. Jacopo Bonan

Citations in the corpus