Determinants of intellectual capital disclosure: evidence from Australia
By Alexander Brüggen, P. Vergauwen, Mai Dao. 2009
262 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d50fbec904577913edec158929d3648d3faca394
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Intellectual capital and firm performance in Australia (2011, background): “Guthrie and Petty (2000), Sciulli et al. (2002), Guthrie et al. (2006), Abeysekera (2007), Dumay and Tull (2007), Sujan & Abeysekera (2007), White et al. (2007), Brüggen et al. (2009) and Woodcock & Whiting (2009) have all investigated Australian IC disclosure practices.”
- Corporate governance and intellectual capital disclosure (2016, unknown): “For example, Australian studies by Brüggen et al. (2009) and Whiting and Woodcock (2011) have provided support, but the NZ study by De Silva et al. (2014) provided no support.”
- Using content analysis as a research methodology for investigating intellectual capital disclosure : a critique (2015, methodology): “However, some studies use an index of IC words and phrases, and specifically search for exact matches in the texts aided by a computer (Brüggen et al., 2009).”
- The value relevance of intellectual capital disclosures (2011, methodology): “In this study, the framework to measure ICD is adopted from Brüggen et al. (2009) as detailed in Table I.”
- Grand theories as barriers to using IC concepts (2012, result): “This is supported by a study by Bruggen et al. (2009”