Sources of tolerance to terminal drought in the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) minicore germplasm
By L. Krishnamurthy, J. Kashiwagi, P. Gaur, H. D. Upadhyaya, Vincent Vadez. 2010
124 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4ef524e7b8b4cbaf3159f2b07e2e9424d18eebf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Agronomy and Crop Science
In Plant Science
- P. Gaur
- D. Tan
- Viola Devasirvatham
- Vincent Vadez
- Sushil K. Chaturvedi
- P. Basu
- Rajeev K. Varshney
- Abhishek Rathore
Citations in the corpus
- Impact of High Temperature and Drought Stresses on Chickpea Production (2018, methodology): “Based on this method, five of the most drought tolerant genotypes and 20 highly drought sensitive genotypes among 211 genotypes were identified [14].”
- Small temporal differences in water uptake among varieties of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) are critical for grain yield under terminal drought (2013, background): “For example, in a trial examining twenty chickpea genotypes that were selected based on their highly divergent phenotypes under terminal drought stress during 3 years of field assessments (Krishnamurthy et al. 2010), eleven out of twelve tolerant lines were also tolerant in the lysimeters, and seven”
- Large genetic variation for heat tolerance in the reference collection of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm (2011, background): “For example, ICC 14 778 (Table 1), listed in this work as the stable heat-tolerant one, was also a top drought-tolerant accession (Krishnamurthy et al., 2010) that is known not only to yield high temperature under drought but also to maintain a cooler canopy temperature at peak pod-filling phase whe”