Intranational Home Bias in Trade

By H. Wolf. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2000

489 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4d817418a4892b00c38761e9bef2afdea7a02d8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Home Bias in Online Investments: An Empirical Study of an Online Crowdfunding Market (2016, unknown): “Studies of home bias have flourished in many disciplines such as economics and finance (Ahearne, et al. 2004, Disdier and Head 2008, Graham, et al. 2009, Overman, et al. 2003, Sorenson and Stuart 2001, Wolf 2000).”
Is the International Border Effect Larger than the Domestic Border Effect? Evidence from U.S. Trade (2009, unknown): “Following Wolf (2000), we use the 48 contiguous U.S. states.”
Regional Wage and Employment Responses to Market Potential in the EU (2005, background): “5 The existing work on sub-national bilateral trade flows uses regional trade inside given countries, the United States for Wolf (2000) and France for Combes et al. (2005) for instance.”
Disintegration and Trade (2003, methodology): “24 Wolf (2000), “Intranational Home Bias in Trade”, Review of Economics and Statistics 82 (4), 555-563.”
Countries, regions and trade: On the welfare impacts of economic integration (2007, background): “Even more surprising, the evidence suggests that spatial price discrimination and border effects are pervasive within major industrialized countries (Greenhut, 1981; Wolf, 2000).”
Intra-national versus International Trade in the European Union: Why do National Borders Matter? (2004, unknown): “Wolf (1997, 2000b) points out that intermediate goods trade generally covers shorter distances than does Þnal goods trade, leading him to argue that the clustering of intermediate stages of production might explain the large coefficients on the border dummy variable.”
Is gravity linear (2008, methodology): “Specifically, as in Wolf (2000), Remoteij = P48 k=1,k 6=j (dik/GSPk), where dik is the distance from i to k; Remoteji is analogously defined.”
Intra-national trade costs: Assaying regional frictions (2019, background): “Interestingly, our estimates are also in contrast with the very large and significant estimates of adjacency from Wolf (2000), who obtains estimates of the effects of contiguity between states that vary between 0.94 and 1.02 from alternative specifications.23 Column (2) of Table 2 also reports…”
The law of one price: intranational evidence for Canada (2003, background): “However, studies of intranational trade report significant border effects for U.S. states (Wolf 2000) and Canadian provinces (Ceglowski 2000; and Helliwell and Verdier 2001).”