Mixture Density Networks
By Sargur N. Srihari. 1994
Subfields: Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods
- Yoshua Bengio
- Richard E. Turner
- Zoubin Ghahramani
- Stefano Ermon
- Iain Murray
- Max Welling
- Balaji Lakshminarayanan
- Yarin Gal
Citations in the corpus
- Generating Sequences With Recurrent Neural Networks (2013, methodology): “The idea of mixture density networks [2, 3] is to use the outputs of a neural network to parameterise a mixture distribution.”
- WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio (2016, methodology): “One approach to modeling the conditional distributions p ( x t | x 1 , . . . , x t − 1 ) over the individual audio samples would be to use a mixture model such as a mixture density network (Bishop, 1994) or mixture of conditional Gaussian scale mixtures (MCGSM) (Theis & Bethge, 2015).”
- Symbolic Music Generation with Diffusion Models (2021, methodology): “We compare our model to an autoregressive transformer with a mixture density output layer [22] and train on the same dataset as the diffusion model.”
- f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimization (2016, background): “Mixture density networks [2] are neural networks which directly regress the parameters of a finite parametric mixture model.”
- RNADE: The real-valued neural autoregressive density-estimator (2013, methodology): “That is, the outputs are mixture density networks [6], with a shared hidden layer, using the same parameter tying as NADE.”
- Natural TTS Synthesis by Conditioning Wavenet on MEL Spectrogram Predictions (2017, methodology): “We also experimented with a log-likelihood loss by modeling the output distribution with a Mixture Density Network [23, 24] to avoid assuming a constant variance over time, but found that these were more difficult to train and they did not lead to better sounding samples.”
- Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles (2016, background): “(2) In cases where the Gaussian is too-restrictive, one could use a complex distribution e.g. mixture density network (Bishop, 1994) or a heavy-tailed distribution.”
- Variational Information Distillation for Knowledge Transfer (2019, methodology): “Other types of parameterizations such as a heavy-tailed distribution or the mixture density network [5] could be used to gain additional performance.”
- Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Counterfactual-Based Data Augmentation (2020, methodology): “For example, the deterministic dynamics model has been extended by parameterizing it with a Gaussian distribution or a Gaussian mixture distribution for better generalization [28].”
- A Meta-Transfer Objective for Learning to Disentangle Causal Mechanisms (2019, methodology): “We model the conditionals with mixture density networks (Bishop, 1994) and the marginals by a Gaussian mixture.”
- World Models (2018, methodology): “This approach is known as a Mixture Density Network (Bishop, 1994) combined with a RNN (MDN-RNN) (Graves, 2013; Ha, 2017a), and has been applied in the past for sequence generation problems such as generating handwriting (Graves, 2013) and sketches (Ha & Eck, 2017).”
- A Multi-Horizon Quantile Recurrent Forecaster (2017, background): “n identical encoder and decoder. DeepAR directly outputs parameters of a Negative Binomial. This is similar toNg et al, 2017where an MLP predicts Gaussian parameters, and such a strategy dates back toBishop, 1994. DeepAR is trained by maximizing likelihood and Teacher Forcing (feeding ground truth r”
- Implicit Behavioral Cloning (2021, methodology): “Explicit “MSE” models are 60 trained with Mean Square Error (MSE), explicit “MDN” models are Mixture Density Networks (MDN) 61 [21], and implicit “EBM” models are trained with LInfoNCE and optimized with derivative-free optimization.”
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Fisher Divergence Critic Regularization (2021, methodology): “Behavior policy We fit the behavior model using a conditional Mixture of Gaussians (Bishop, 1994) with tanh squash-ing (Haarnoja et al., 2017).”
- Transporter Networks: Rearranging the Visual World for Robotic Manipulation (2020, methodology): “To represent multi-modality, ConvMLP, GT-State MLP, and 2-step GT-State MLP regress mixture densities [43].”
- Watch, Try, Learn: Meta-Learning from Demonstrations and Reward (2019, methodology): “At the output, we use mixture density networks (MDN) [2] to represent the distribution over actions.”
- One-Shot Imitation from Observing Humans via Domain-Adaptive Meta-Learning (2018, methodology): “All methods use a mixture density network [4] to represent the action space, where the actions correspond to the linear and rotational velocity of the robot gripper, a 6-dimensional continuous action space.”
- Vision-Based Multi-Task Manipulation for Inexpensive Robots Using End-to-End Learning from Demonstration (2017, methodology): “While autoregressive estimators usually discretize the output, we use mixture of Gaussians to predict the entire probability distribution of the output, providing a rich and expressive class of distributions.”
- Detecting and Recognizing Human-Object Interactions (2017, methodology): “To improve target localization prediction, we tried to substitute the uni-modal regression network with a Mixture Density Network (MDN) [1].”