Timing-based LTP and LTD at vertical inputs to layer II/III pyramidal cells in rat barrel cortex.

By D. Feldman. Neuron, 2000

712 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4c63e465aea63f0ea46bb2f92bcdc8aaf8a6d08

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Citations in the corpus

The spike timing dependence of plasticity (2012, background): “This STDP rule drives net LTD in response to either uncorrelated spiking or systematic post-leading-pre spiking (Feldman, 2000).”
Inhibitory synaptic plasticity: spike timing-dependence and putative network function (2013, background): “…insensitivity of inhibitory plasticity to the exact shape of the learning window contrasts to the high sensitivity of excitatory plasticity to the formulation of the STDP curves, in particular the importance of the LTD window size relative to the LTP time window (Feldman, 2000; Song et al., 2000).”
Dendritic excitability and synaptic plasticity. (2008, neutral): “230, 717), sensory cortex (208, 553), and the amygdala”
Intrinsic Stabilization of Output Rates by Spike-Based Hebbian Learning (2001, background): “The qualitative time course of the learning window is supported by experimental results (Levy & Stewart, 1983; Markram et al., 1997; Zhang et al., 1998; Debanne et al., 1998; Bi & Poo, 1998; Feldman, 2000; see also the reviews by Brown & Chattarji, 1994; Linden, 1999; Paulsen & Sejnowski, 2000; and ”
Decoupling through synchrony in neuronal circuits with propagation delays. (2008, neutral): “In most systems studied to date, presynaptic inputs arriving before postsynaptic spikes lead to synaptic strengthening, while inputs arriving after postsynaptic spikes lead to weakening (Hebbian STDP) (Markram et al., 1997; Bi and Poo, 1998; Feldman , 2000).”
Relating STDP to BCM (2003, background): “…called spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP; Markram, Lubke, Frotscher, & Sakmann, 1997; Bi & Poo, 1998; Debanne , Gahwiler, & Thomson, 1998; Feldman, 2000; Sjostrom, Turrigiano, & Nelson, 2001; Froemke & Dan, 2002), in which the temporal order of presynaptic and postsynaptic spikes…”
A History of Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity (2011, background): “A few years later, Gunter Stent tried to explain the loss of connections suggested by Hubel and Wiesel’s monocular deprivation experiments (Hubel and Wiesel, 1965; Wiesel and Hubel, 1965), by postulating the inverse to Hebbian learning (Stent, 1973). Stent proposed that “When the presynaptic axon of”
Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Balanced Random Networks (2007, neutral): “, Feldman , 2000 ; Froemke & Dan , 2002 ) .”