GRASSROOTS ECOLOGY: PLANT-MICROBE-SOIL INTERACTIONS AS DRIVERS OF PLANT COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS

By H. Reynolds, A. Packer, James D. Bever, K. Clay. 2003

742 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4c3bea2d8ed1ab84e731cc3c026d2cd4f29d910

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

PLANT DEFENSE BELOWGROUND AND SPATIOTEMPORAL PROCESSES IN NATURAL VEGETATION (2003, background): “The feedback between plants and soil organisms can be positive, neutral, or negative for the plants involved, for their offspring, and for other plant species in the community (Reynolds et al. 2003).”
Is successional research nearing its climax? New approaches for understanding dynamic communities (2015, background): “As succession continues, antagonistic microbes will accumulate in the system, shifting microbial function towards greater negative effects on plant performance (Reynolds et al. 2003).”
Do plant species with different growth strategies vary in their ability to compete with soil microbes for chemical forms of nitrogen (2008, background): “…use of a limited range of chemical forms of N, might provide a mechanism for plants to efficiently partition a limited soil N pool, thereby facilitating species coexistence and the maintenance of plant diversity (McKane et al., 2002; Reynolds et al., 2003; Miller and Bowman, 2003; Bardgett, 2005).”
Plant‐soil feedbacks as drivers of succession: evidence from remnant and restored tallgrass prairies (2015, background): “Early successional plant species generate strong negative feedbacks, likely because they are weakly defended against pathogens (van der Putten 2003) and also because they are relatively unresponsive to microbial mutualists (Reynolds et al. 2003, Hoeksema et al. 2010).”
Plant and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) communities – which drives which? (2014, background): “More generally, AMF canmodify plant niches and affect plant–soil feedback, thereby altering the entire network of biotic interactions (Reynolds et al. 2003; Bever et al. 2010, 2012).”
Synthesis and future research directions linking tree diversity to growth, survival, and damage in a global network of tree diversity experiments (2018, background): “following disturbance or planting, secondary succession takes place through species turnover and both biotic and abiotic modification of the soil over the course of decades (25–75 years; Reynolds et al., 2003; Kahmen and Poschlod, 2004; McLauchlan et al., 2006).”
Plant coexistence and the niche (2004, background): “Partitioning of soil resources can also involve microbial mediation (Box 1). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) have higher diversity and can be more specific in their relationships with plants than was once thought [45,46], which explains experimental evidence that plant diversity can depend upon A”
Shrubs influence arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities in a semi-arid environment (2011, background): “…AMFeplant interactions may depend on belowground feedbacks (Casper et al., 2008) which explain how the presence of a given plant species modifies the soil community in a way that eventually alters its own and other species’ performance (Bever, 1999, 2003; Klironomos, 2002; Reynolds et al., 2003).”
Plant pathogen protection by arbuscular mycorrhizas: a role for fungal diversity? (2010, background): “The role of below-ground soil organisms interacting with plant roots has gained increased attention in recent years (e.g. Reynolds et al. 2003; van der Putten 2003; Callaway et al. 2004), and the interactions between beneficial and pathogenic organisms have been identified as being particularly…”
Plant nitrogen uptake drives rhizosphere bacterial community assembly during plant growth (2015, background): “Across the growing season, plants can stimulate rhizosphere bacteria to increase soil nutrient availability for plant nutrient uptake (Reynolds et al., 2003; Levine et al., 2006; Bever et al., 2012), ultimately benefiting plant productivity (Ehrenfeld et al.”
Independent variations of plant and soil mixtures reveal soil feedback effects on plant community overyielding (2013, background): “…hypothesis has recently been challenged by putting forward an alternative ‘pathogen niche’ hypothesis, suggesting that build-up of specific soil biota decreases plant productivity in species-poor grasslands (Westover & Bever 2001; Bever 2003; Reynolds et al. 2003; Petermann et al. 2008).”