The destabilisation of existing regimes: Confronting a multi-dimensional framework with a case study of the British coal industry (1913-1967)

By Bruno Turnheim, Frank W. Geels. 2013

341 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4b7cef2dfe8b371bdc1e7e3b81c92d74d1ff956

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Revisiting carbon lock-in in energy systems: Explaining the perpetuation of coal power in Japan (2020, background): “These include discourse [24], cultural or cognitive frames and institutions [25,28,29], economic conditions and intellectual capacities that guide, incentivise or restrain the behaviour of regime actors [30,31].”
Policy mixes for incumbency: Exploring the destructive recreation of renewable energy, shale gas ‘fracking,’ and nuclear power in the United Kingdom (2017, neutral): “If regime resistance is itself to be countered by deliberate efforts at ‘regime destabilisation’ (Scrase & Smith 2009; Turnheim & Geels 2012; Turnheim & Geels 2013; Bosman et al. 2014; Karltorp & Sandén 2012) then the scope of what constitutes the politics of transitions becomes significantly wider…”
The political economy of coal in Poland: Drivers and barriers for a shift away from fossil fuels (2020, neutral): “…call for a stronger integration of social sciences in energy and transition research (Sovacool et al., 2015) – including the analysis of how the incumbent fossil fuel regimes can be destabilised and eventually replaced (Kivimaa and Kern, 2016; Kungl and Geels, 2016; Turnheim and Geels, 2013).”
Exploring the role of phase-out policies for low-carbon energy transitions: the case of the German Energiewende (2017, neutral): “So far, attention towards destabilization has focused on how particular socio technical regimes become weakened through technical, economic and political pressures, as suggested by the historical case study of UK coal [13,14].”
Sequence and alignment of external pressures in industry destabilisation: Understanding the downfall of incumbent utilities in the German energy transition (1998–2015) (2017, methodology): “Because of these limitations, we build on a conceptual framework developed by Turnheim and Geels (2013) which understands destabilisation as a multi-dimensional process including the interplay of various external pressures and endogenous responses (see Section 2).”
Climate change and the slow reorientation of the American car industry (1979–2012): An application and extension of the Dialectic Issue LifeCycle (DILC) model (2015, background): “Policy (2014), of this paper (Section 6), we therefore follow Turnheim and Geels (2013) in developing a ‘pressure table’, which maps the temporal development of various pressures in the case study.)”
Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: Bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges (2015, neutral): “…approach treats inertia differently, suggesting different approaches to the dual governance problem of sustaining momentum (and promoting radical innovations) (Smith and Raven, 2012) and overcoming inertia (and breaking up the resistance of mature and stable incumbents) (Turnheim and Geels, 2013).”