Generative Adversarial Networks for Hyperspectral Image Classification

By Lin Zhu, Yushi Chen, Pedram Ghamisi, Jon Atli Benediktsson. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2018

584 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A generative adversarial network (GAN) usually contains a generative network and a discriminative network in competition with each other. The GAN has shown its capability in a variety of applications. In this paper, the usefulness and effectiveness of GAN for classification of hyperspectral images (HSIs) are explored for the first time. In the proposed GAN, a convolutional neural network (CNN) is designed to discriminate the inputs and another CNN is used to generate so-called fake inputs. The aforementioned CNNs are trained together: the generative CNN tries to generate fake inputs that are as real as possible, and the discriminative CNN tries to classify the real and fake inputs. This kind of adversarial training improves the generalization capability of the discriminative CNN, which is really important when the training samples are limited. Specifically, we propose two schemes: 1) a well-designed 1D-GAN as a spectral classifier and 2) a robust 3D-GAN as a spectral–spatial classifier. Furthermore, the generated adversarial samples are used with real training samples to fine-tune the discriminative CNN, which improves the final classification performance. The proposed classifiers are carried out on three widely used hyperspectral data sets: Salinas, Indiana Pines, and Kennedy Space Center. The obtained results reveal that the proposed models provide competitive results compared to the state-of-the-art methods. In addition, the proposed GANs open new opportunities in the remote sensing community for the challenging task of HSI classification and also reveal the huge potential of GAN-based methods for the analysis of such complex and inherently nonlinear data.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4a560b617175d20c9dbd063c5dc2e8f7478e2a6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Jocelyn Chanussot
  2. Shutao Li
  3. Leyuan Fang
  4. Antonio J. Plaza
  5. Danfeng Hong
  6. Pedram Ghamisi
  7. Jon Atli Benediktsson
  8. Swalpa Kumar Roy

In Media Technology

  1. Jocelyn Chanussot
  2. Shutao Li
  3. Antonio J. Plaza
  4. Pedram Ghamisi
  5. Jon Atli Benediktsson
  6. Leyuan Fang
  7. Danfeng Hong
  8. Yushi Chen

Citations in the corpus