The state of the Dutch larger moth fauna
By D. Groenendijk, W. N. Ellis. Journal of Insect Conservation, 2011
90 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4792d296e3250667bbe848675b2178aa944dd63
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Kris A. G. Wyckhuys
- F. Sánchez‐Bayo
- R. Fox
- F. Berendse
- E. Veenendaal
- ROY H. A. Van GRUNSVEN
- M. WallisDeVries
- Frank van Langevelde
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Kris A. G. Wyckhuys
- F. Sánchez‐Bayo
- R. Fox
- F. Berendse
- E. Veenendaal
- ROY H. A. Van GRUNSVEN
- M. WallisDeVries
- Frank van Langevelde
Citations in the corpus
- Effect of spectral composition of artificial light on the attraction of moths (2011, background): “As the larvae of the majority of larger moth species have a generalized spectrum of host plants (Groenendijk and Ellis, 2011), the decline in their abundance due to light pollution might translate in a general decline in herbivore pressure.”
- Macro‐moth families differ in their attraction to light: implications for light‐trap monitoring programmes (2014, unknown): “Similar trends have been shown for The Netherlands, albeit based on non-standardised sampling (Groenendijk & Ellis, 2011).”
- Artificial light at night inhibits mating in a Geometrid moth (2015, background): “…for mitigation of potential negative effects of artificial light on moths, which is important given the rapid declines of moth populations in western Europe (Conrad et al., 2006; Groenendijk & Ellis, 2011; Fox et al., 2014) and the suggested role of artificial night lighting therein (Fox, 2013).”
- Artificial night lighting disrupts sex pheromone in a noctuid moth (2015, background): “, 2006; Groenendijk & Ellis, 2011; Fox etal.”
- Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers (2019, background): “In particular, 47 of the 55 species monitored in peat-bog marshes declined, six remained stable and only two (Plusia putnami and Deltote bankiana) increased in range (Groenendijk and Ellis, 2011).”
- The decline of moths in Great Britain: a review of possible causes (2013, background): “…found significant relationships between overwintering life-cycle stage and species trend; moths that overwinter in the egg stage had declined (on average) more than others (Conrad et al., 2004; Groenendijk & Ellis, 2011; and a similar result for butterflies in WallisDeVries & van Swaay, 2006).”