DIFFUSION OF CRIME CONTROL BENEFITS: OBSERVATIONS ON THE REVERSE OF DISPLACEMENT
By R. Clarke, David Weisburd. 2006
426 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d477e2ead9e3f3894bdd13b65001a2d2313b5cb9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Andrew V. Papachristos
- David M Hureau
- Daniel J. Woods
- Bruce G. Taylor
- Christopher S. Koper
- Anthony A. Braga
Citations in the corpus
- The Effects of Focused Deterrence Strategies on Crime (2012, background): “A number of scholars have focused on the mechanism of ‘‘discouragement’’ when discussing crime prevention benefits of interventions (see, e.g., Clarke and Weisburd 1994).”
- The Effects of Hot Spots Policing on Crime: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2014, background): “More recently, academics have observed that crime prevention programs may result in the complete opposite of displacement—that crime control benefits were greater than expected and “spill over” into places beyond the target areas (Clarke and Weisburd 1994).”
- Hot spots policing and crime prevention: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (2005, background): “More recently, academics have observed that crime prevention programs may result in the complete opposite of displacement Y that crime control benefits were greater than expected and Bspill over^ into places beyond the target areas (Clarke and Weisburd 1994).”
- A randomized controlled trial of different policing strategies at hot spots of violent crime (2011, background): “Further, in five studies that addressed the issue, there were no obvious or consistent signs that crime was displaced to nearby areas; on the contrary, in three of these cases, there was evidence that crime reduction benefits extended to areas outside the hot spot— i.e., a diffusion of crime control”
- Effects of Hot Spots Policing on Crime (2007, background): “More recently, academics have observed that crime prevention programs may result in the complete opposite of displacement—that crime control benefits were greater than expected and “spill over” into places beyond the target areas (Clarke and Weisburd, 1994).”