Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of refractory metal implants, titanium, hafnium, niobium, tantalum and rhenium.

By H. Matsuno, A. Yokoyama, F. Watari, M. Uo, T. Kawasaki. Biomaterials, 2001

757 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Nutrition and Dietetics, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d463e01b9c0025a53e72d66e89ed4a457b51944a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. R. Kolli
2. C. Wen

In Surgery

1. R. Kolli
2. A. Devaraj

Citations in the corpus

• A new look at biomedical Ti-based shape memory alloys. (2012, background): “Ta demonstrates excellent corrosion resistance, low cytotoxicity, and good osteocompatibility [10,26,30], though it also exhibits sarcomas due to the implantation of thin foils [44,45].”
• A Review of Metastable Beta Titanium Alloys (2018, background): “Of the many beta phase stabilizing elements Nb, Ta, Zr, Mo, and Sn have been identified as having good biocompatibility with low toxicity and better corrosion properties compared to other elements [6,7,12,75,78].”