Predation by wolves interacts with the North Pacific Oscillation (NPO) on a western North American elk population

By Mark Hebblewhite. 2005

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d45c6bd09adb80d9882c41774407ad3a9338e853

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. W. Ripple
2. R. Beschta
3. Mark A. Hurley
4. P. Zager
5. John R. Skalski
6. E. O. Garton
7. D. M. Montgomery
8. J. Unsworth

In Ecology

1. W. Ripple
2. R. Beschta
3. Douglas W. Smith
4. P. J. White
5. J. Linnell
6. M. Kauffman
7. P. Zager
8. Mark A. Hurley

Citations in the corpus

• Relative influence of human harvest, carnivores, and weather on adult female elk survival across western North America (2013, background): “…(Salo et al. 2010; Griffin et al. 2011), hunting pressure (Biederbeck, Boulay & Jackson 2001; Vucetich, Smith & Stahler 2005), habitat quality (Melis et al. 2009), land-use (Cole, Pope & Anthony 1997) and weather (Hebblewhite 2005), which often have limited variability at a particular locality.”
• Predation or scavenging? Prey body condition influences decision‐making in a facultative predator, the wolverine (2016, background): “…by the drop in the proportion of calves killed between seasons (87 to 29%). in deep snow, heavier reindeer may sink more than smaller ones, hindering their flight and making them more vulnerable to predation (Hebblewhite 2005) possibly explaining the lack of a negative correlation with body mass.”
• Restoring Yellowstone’s aspen with wolves (2007, background): “predators, climatic fluctuations might influence wolf-elk predation patterns ( Hebblewhite, 2005 ) or allow for increased aspen growth in riparian areas due to the combination of reduced herbivory and a series of moist years (Romme et al., 1995).”
• Demographic Response of Mule Deer to Experimental Reduction of Coyotes and Mountain Lions in Southeastern Idaho (2011, methodology): “Because of this correlation and the repeatedmeasures nature of population rate of increase, we tested for autocorrelation in the rate of increase and main effects of coyote or mountain lion removal treatments over the 6 1-yr intervals of the study (Hebblewhite 2005).”