THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CLUTCH‐SIZE. Part III.—Some Interspecific Comparisons
By D. Lack. 2008
111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Parasitology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4574ff6599695053f10a7afb7d861fd6ba85750
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- A. Chalfoun
- K. Cockle
- K. Martin
- J. D. Ibáñez-Álamo
- T. E. Martin
- R. Magrath
- T. Haff
- Connor E. Armstad
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Parasitology
- A. Chalfoun
- Connor E. Armstad
- Evertius Enroe Bin Soudi
- J. D. Ibáñez-Álamo
- K. Fierro‐Calderón
- T. E. Martin
- M. Lammertink
- Adam E. Mitchell
Citations in the corpus
- Enclosed nests may provide greater thermal than nest predation benefits compared with open nests across latitudes (2017, background): “1U.S. Geological Survey, Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA; 2Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA; and 3Sabah”
- Cavity characteristics, but not habitat, influence nest survival of cavity-nesting birds along a gradient of human impact in the subtropical Atlantic Forest (2015, background): “Cavity-nesting birds may be able to increase their reproductive output by using a cavity with features that protect young from predators and inclement weather (Lack, 1948; Wesołowski, 2002; Wesołowski and Rowiński, 2012).”
- Nest predation research: recent findings and future perspectives (2015, background): “Increased nest predation is expected to favour faster growth in evolutionary time (Lack 1948; Bosque and Bosque 1995; Martin 1995; Remeš and Martin 2002), and species with greater nest predation risk evolve faster growth and an associated reduction in provisioning rates (Martin et al. 2011).”