Object Attraction in Subject-Verb Agreement Construction

By Robert J. Hartsuiker, Inés Antón-Méndez, Marije van Zee. 2001

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d45409246aa25ed5073b5dea3a0e1c39e31c1863

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Colin Phillips
2. Ellen F. Lau
3. M. Wagers
4. Jon Sprouse
5. Ian Cunnings

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Colin Phillips
2. Ellen F. Lau
3. M. Wagers
4. Jon Sprouse

In Language and Linguistics

1. Ellen F. Lau
2. Colin Phillips
3. M. Wagers

Citations in the corpus

• Plausibility and grammatical agreement (2003, unknown): “On average, the experimental session took less than 25 min.”
• Agreement Attraction in Comprehension: Representations and Processes. (2009, background): “…Dutch study by Hartsuiker and colleagues showed that Subject SG –Object PL –Verb configurations can induce agreement attraction in production, although error rates were lower than is generally observed in PP-modifier constructions (Hartsuiker et al., 2001; although cf. Hemforth & Konieczny, 2003).”