Conservation, ecotourism, poverty, and income inequality – A case study of nature reserves in Qinling, China
By Ben Ma, Z. Cai, Jie Zheng, Yali Wen. World Development, 2019
134 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The impacts of nature reserves (NRs) and ecotourism on local economies are considered controversial. By surveying households residing inside and outside of six giant panda NRs in the Qinling Mountains from 2015 to 2017, this study evaluates the impacts of NRs and ecotourism on the poverty and income inequality of local communities in China. Our results suggest that the local communities of NRs show higher poverty and lower income levels compared to the national average. NRs significantly reduced the net income of households residing within the NRs, and most of these reductions are caused by converting cropland to conservation land. NRs also aggravated the income inequality of local communities, and the level of inequality inside NRs was significantly higher than that outside. In terms of the impacts from ecotourism, ecotourism can reduce poverty, but it increases income inequality, especially for those households residing within NRs.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4451d2ab46e0ae343fe4f88faa4961334473272
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- The Influence of Tourism on Income Inequality (2020, methodology): “Even though there is a literature dealing with the potential influence of tourism on income inequality (Ma et al. 2019; Oviedo-García, GonzálezRodríguez, and Vega-Vázquez 2019; Njoya and Seetaram 2018; S. Lee and O’Leary 2008), the current results are still mixed and not conclusive, as the…”