Ranking quality of life using subjective well-being data

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Valuing scenic amenity using life satisfaction data (2011, background): “Shields and Wooden, 2003), although is in stark contrast to studies elsewhere (cf. Brereton et al., 2008; Moro et al., 2008).”
Well-Being across America (2011, unknown): “…(1998), Plaut, Markus, and Lachman (2002), Gabriel, Mattey, and Wascher (2003), Propper et al. (2005), Weich et al. (2005), Powdthavee (2006), Moro et al. (2008), and Luechinger (2009).3 Propper et al. (2005) and Weich et al. (2005) find little geographical variation in mental health once…”
Estimating the cost of air pollution in South East Queensland: An application of the life satisfaction non-market valuation approach (2013, background): “This is by no means a minor issue; the limited reliability and availabilty of air pollution data has led Moro et al. (2008) to omit air quality from their development of indices ranking quality of life.”
Internet use and well-being: A survey and a theoretical framework (2018, background): “The physical environment has extensively been investigated in well-being studies (Blomquist et al., 1988; Moro et al., 2008; Prescott-Allen, 2001; Schmitt, 2013; Zhang et al., 2015).”