Underplating in the Himalaya-Tibet Collision Zone Revealed by the Hi-CLIMB Experiment

By J. Nábělek, G. Hetényi, Jérôme Vergne, S. Sapkota, B. Kafle, M. Jiang, H. Su, John Chen, Bor‐Shouh Huang. Science, 2009

797 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Himalayan-Tibetan Underplate The Himalayas formed from the collision of India with Eurasia beginning about 50 million years ago, but the fate and position of the subducted Indian crust was not well defined until the Hi-CLIMB seismic experiment was initiated. The centerpiece of the project is an 800-kilometer-long, closely spaced, linear array of broadband seismographs, extending from the Ganges lowland, across the Himalayas, and onto the central Tibetan plateau. Nábělek et al. (p. 1371) present images of the crust and upper mantle of the Southern Tibetan plateau underthrust northward by the Indian plate, in which they trace the base of the Indian plate to 31°N. The character of the crust-mantle interface in this region suggests that the Indian crust is at least partly decoupled from the mantle beneath. A seismic study delineates the position and local thickening of the Indian plate underlying the Himalayas and southern Tibet. We studied the formation of the Himalayan mountain range and the Tibetan Plateau by investigating their lithospheric structure. Using an 800-kilometer-long, densely spaced seismic array, we have constructed an image of the crust and upper mantle beneath the Himalayas and the southern Tibetan Plateau. The image reveals in a continuous fashion the Main Himalayan thrust fault as it extends from a shallow depth under Nepal to the mid-crust under southern Tibet. Indian crust can be traced to 31°N. The crust/mantle interface beneath Tibet is anisotropic, indicating shearing during its formation. The dipping mantle fabric suggests that the Indian mantle is subducting in a diffuse fashion along several evolving subparallel structures.

Subfields: Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a73fa15d9646d476fadd1bd58cd40b08169390ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geophysics

Citations in the corpus

Seismic imaging: From classical to adjoint tomography (2012, background): “Over the next 10 years, a series of pioneering studies in linear (Dziewonski, 1984; Nakanishi and Anderson, 1982; Woodhouse and Dziewonski, 1984) and non-linear (Ho-Liu et al., 1988, 1989; Snieder and Romanowicz, 1988; Tarantola and Valette, 1982) inversions followed suit, combining mathematical…”