High‐precision wavelength calibration of astronomical spectrographs with laser frequency combs

By M. Murphy, T. Udem, Ronald Holzwarth, A. Sizmann, L. Pasquini, C. Araujo-Hauck, H. Dekker, S. D’odorico, M. Fischer, T. Hansch and 6 more. 2007

344 citations recorded by the source corpus.

ABSTRACT We describe a possible new technique for precise wavelength calibration of high-resolutionastronomical spectrographs using femtosecond-pulsed mode-locked lasers controlled by sta-ble oscillators such as atomic clocks. Such ‘frequency combs’ provide a series of narrowmodes which are uniformly spaced according to the laser’s pulse repetition rate and whoseabsolute frequencies are known a priori with relative precision better than 10 −12 . Simula-tions of frequency comb spectra show that the photon-limited wavelength calibration preci-sion achievable with existing echelle spectrographs should be ∼1cms −1 when integrated overa 4000A range. Moreover, comb spectra may be used to accurately characterise distortionsof the wavelength scale introduced by the spectrograph and detector system. The simulationsshow that frequency combs with pulse repetition rates of 5–30GHz are required, given thetypical resolving power of existing and possible future echelle spectrographs. Achieving suchhigh repetition rates, together with the desire to produce all comb modes with uniform inten-sity over the entire optical range, represent the only significant challenges in the design ofa practical system. Frequency comb systems may remove wavelength calibration uncertain-ties from all practical spectroscopic experiments, even those combining data from differenttelescopes over many decades.Key words: instrumentation: spectrographs – instrumentation: detectors – methods: labora-tory – techniques: spectroscopic

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d429d20eda1c638df6348c87ef5a6f57a98da978

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. T. Hänsch
  2. Ronald Holzwarth
  3. T. Udem
  4. M. Haehnelt
  5. S. Udry
  6. Daniel Foreman-Mackey
  7. M. Mayor
  8. Debra A. Fischer

Citations in the corpus