Earthquake statistics at Parkfield: 1. Stationarity of b values

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evolution of b-value during the seismic cycle: Insights from laboratory experiments on simulated faults (2018, background): “One approach has been to use statistical measures of past seismic activity to infer future behaviors and assess seismic hazard (Schorlemmer et al., 2004; Benz et al., 2015; Gulia et al., 2016).”
Acoustic emissions document stress changes over many seismic cycles in stick‐slip experiments (2013, background): “…doi:10.1002/grl.50507, 2013 Acoustic emissions document stress changes over many seismic cycles in stick-slip experiments T. H. W. Goebel,1 D. Schorlemmer,2 T. W. Becker,1 G. Dresen,3 and C. G. Sammis1 Received 25 February 2013; revised 19 April 2013; accepted 25 April 2013; published 31 May 2013.”
Data‐driven spatial b value estimation with applications to California seismicity: To b or not to b (2015, methodology): “Studies that aim to assess the significance of the obtained spatial b values usually investigate standard deviations [Efron, 1979] and conduct statistical significance tests [Utsu, 1992] based on the subset of events assigned to each grid cell [Enescu and Ito, 2002; Schorlemmer et al., 2003, 2004].”